wuwiandClaude Fable 5
0f9738f5f2
Oliver's verdict on the friendly cycles: wrong on two axes. The new rolls
were PURE PROFILE — "what we actually need is running slightly towards or
away from the player... this was better before although the art was not
coherent" — and the racket re-imagined itself every frame: "it's now jitter
town, strobe like because of the rapidly changing rackets."
Take two runs on TWO references, which is the recipe that has worked all
day: image 1 the friendly identity (anchor frames), image 2 the OLD run row
pulled from git history as the CAMERA law — three-quarter front, chest to
the viewer, exactly the orientation the far baseline needs — with the prompt
pinning the racket ("as if copy-pasted between figures; only the LEGS run").
One-row layouts kept coming back interlocked (nine figures, one 3141px blob,
uncuttable), so the ask became a 2x4 GRID — separation the model actually
delivers, re-laid locally. His roll drew 12 clean figures; the smoothest
8-cycle was chosen by maximising the weakest adjacent stride: 72.7%, against
20-30% on every earlier roll. Hers landed exactly 8. Oliver gated both
strips by eye before install — the automated gates sat this one out on his
call. SPRV 122, main.js v245, all 16 frames verified 200.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>