Oliver's verdict on the friendly cycles: wrong on two axes. The new rolls
were PURE PROFILE — "what we actually need is running slightly towards or
away from the player... this was better before although the art was not
coherent" — and the racket re-imagined itself every frame: "it's now jitter
town, strobe like because of the rapidly changing rackets."
Take two runs on TWO references, which is the recipe that has worked all
day: image 1 the friendly identity (anchor frames), image 2 the OLD run row
pulled from git history as the CAMERA law — three-quarter front, chest to
the viewer, exactly the orientation the far baseline needs — with the prompt
pinning the racket ("as if copy-pasted between figures; only the LEGS run").
One-row layouts kept coming back interlocked (nine figures, one 3141px blob,
uncuttable), so the ask became a 2x4 GRID — separation the model actually
delivers, re-laid locally. His roll drew 12 clean figures; the smoothest
8-cycle was chosen by maximising the weakest adjacent stride: 72.7%, against
20-30% on every earlier roll. Hers landed exactly 8. Oliver gated both
strips by eye before install — the automated gates sat this one out on his
call. SPRV 122, main.js v245, all 16 frames verified 200.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Oliver's batch, delivered in dependency order. "The opponents look pretty
harsh, almost already pre-zombie" — so BOTH tennis opponents got a new
identity: warm skin, human eyes, an easy near-smile, rolled anchor-first so
every later sheet inherits the face. The male's bounce pair also ADOPTS the
female's palm-out posture (his old crouched receiver stance was the wrong
pose for bouncing a ball — her better one is now the shared convention), and
the pre-serve ball was re-measured onto the drawn palms: BOUNCE_IDLE's oDx
0.45 -> 0.24 / oApex 0.55 -> 0.72 for his close carry, with her wider reach
riding TOURS (oDx 0.48 / oApex 0.73) the same way the player's pair already
does.
"parts of the body as well as the inner of the racket are solid" — the beds
were the cutter's own doing: _fine.key repaints enclosed magenta pale grey
(protection against accidental magenta strings), which defeated the beds we
now draw magenta ON PURPOSE. key()/main() grow a bed=True switch (the
famroll convention, used by _runroll and the refresh cuts); the run cycles'
beds went from ~70% to ~44% opaque — strings, not paddles. Enclosed pockets
of a roll's off-spec background (one sheet came back on blue) are scrubbed
by corner-colour distance too.
Both RUN CYCLES re-rolled off the friendly anchors: his landed 8 clean
frames (racket +0.05..+0.30, one side); hers took four rolls — the gates
caught a white background, a crossing racket, near-dup neighbours — and the
keeper drew a 10-frame cycle, from which the best 8 were chosen by
maximising the minimum adjacent stride (29.7%, smoother than his 22.7).
o_run7/8 return to the SPR list.
AND THE CHASE STOPS DITHERING (Oliver: "switching between a left and right
movement increasingly faster the nearer the ball comes"): intercept()
re-solves every frame and the earliest-reachable point jumps around its
solution as the flight shortens, flipping his run direction each time. The
CPU now commits to its stored target unless a fresh solve moves it by more
than 0.35 m. SPRV 121, main.js v244, 66 tests, every opponent frame verified
200 in the live game.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Her run cycle carried a DETACHED SHOE floating behind her in every frame —
a cut that kept two blobs per figure — spotted while fixing the men's
flicker. Four rolls to a keeper: roll 1 closed on a duplicate (8->1 at
4.4%, gated), roll 2 came back a grid, roll 3's grid was re-laid into one
row locally but its racket flipped sides frame to frame (-0.42..+0.31, the
exact "flashing left and right" the warning exists for), roll 4 landed:
eight frames, racket steady at +0.05..+0.17, one face, no luggage. SPRV 119.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Oliver: 'the motion seems very flashy and unnatural'. Two causes, both
measured: drawChar centres a frame by its total width while the racket's
reach varies across the cycle, so the BODY teleported sideways up to 28
source px on a frame swap (the female player was worst) — every frame is now
padded until its lower-third centroid sits at the frame centre (residuals
±0.2 px, the normalisation lives in _runroll.py's cut). And the hardcoded
4.5 cycles/s was tuned on 2-4 near-duplicate frames; on eight real phases it
was a strobe — rolled sets stride at TUNE.runHz (2.4), old art keeps 4.5.
In-pane: body wobble down from ~36 device px per swap to 3.2.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The old run frames were generated one at a time and it showed: 91/110/92/98 px
of body-width drift, duplicated poses drawn differently, no racket. Each
character (player m/f 6 frames, opponent m/f 8) now comes from ONE 4K call
anchored on a composed identity reference of its settled frames — the broken
run art stayed out of the reference on purpose. Stride-gated, cut with _fine,
judged by eye per roll. drawChar probes run8/run6/run4/run2.
Side effect: the male opponent's old run art faced LEFT against the
art-faces-RIGHT convention — he had been moonwalking right since install.
Fixed by drawing the new rows to the convention.
Pipeline lessons recorded in PROJECT.md (the model negotiates the count; a
back view has no direction; the racket clause goes early and loud).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
wuwiandClaude Fable 5
