Oliver: "look at the headless men — the trouser color changed." He was right and every number in kit() said he was not. Brightness sat at 85 against the healthy frame's 89, comfortably inside tolerance, while the shorts' blue-minus-red walked from a warm charcoal -8.7 to a cold +0.2 across the wound stages. All three existing measures are greyscale or red-channel; none of them can see a grey going blue, which is most of what "the colour changed" ever means here. Fourth number: the shorts' hue. It immediately fails the headless men AND finds a second drift in the wounded women that the brightness test had passed. The tolerance default went to four entries deliberately — kit_off zips got/ref/ tol, so a three-long tuple would have SKIPPED the new check rather than failed it. That is the same shape of silent no-op as the read-only floodfill. Also: DAMAGE NOW ACCUMULATES. Stage 2 said only "headless", so the arm torn off at stage 1 came back — in a mode where the score IS the body, taking a point off it made the body look healthier. Stage 2 is now headless AND still one-armed. And the stride rule got its counterweight: "copy it exactly, only the legs change" has a second failure mode where the model copies it exactly INCLUDING the legs and returns the same picture twice (upper 0.017, legs 0.022 — a body sliding along with frozen feet, the very thing being fixed). Both halves are stated now: identical above the hips, obviously different below. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
17 KiB
119x228px
17 KiB
119x228px