Both full sets through the same pipeline: stances and ball-bounce, serve toss,
smash and both swing frames, the four-frame run, and the five-frame death. The
opponent's ten frames with them. Inner-edge density roughly doubles across the
board — the serve frames go 0.22-0.32 to 0.41-0.54.
_regen.py retries a rejected batch itself now (default three attempts). A
rejection is usually just a bad roll — two figures drawn close enough that the
slicer sees one frame, or a limb off the canvas — and re-rolling fixes it without
me sitting in the loop.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two frames is a lurch, and he is on screen the whole run — during a horde he is
the only thing moving. Regenerated the whole cycle in one pass rather than
bolting two new frames onto the old pair, so the four are consistent with each
other, then fitted them per channel onto the mean and sd of the frames that
stay (idle + swing): mean error under 3 of 255, so he does not change colour
when he starts moving.
The pick is frame-count driven, not hardcoded — the opponent has no run3/run4
and stays on two, and the cycle RATE is unchanged either way: more frames
subdivide the stride, they do not speed it up.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
wuwiandClaude Opus 5
