The opponents come back to life: the friendly refresh, open string beds, and a steadier chase

Oliver's batch, delivered in dependency order. "The opponents look pretty
harsh, almost already pre-zombie" — so BOTH tennis opponents got a new
identity: warm skin, human eyes, an easy near-smile, rolled anchor-first so
every later sheet inherits the face. The male's bounce pair also ADOPTS the
female's palm-out posture (his old crouched receiver stance was the wrong
pose for bouncing a ball — her better one is now the shared convention), and
the pre-serve ball was re-measured onto the drawn palms: BOUNCE_IDLE's oDx
0.45 -> 0.24 / oApex 0.55 -> 0.72 for his close carry, with her wider reach
riding TOURS (oDx 0.48 / oApex 0.73) the same way the player's pair already
does.

"parts of the body as well as the inner of the racket are solid" — the beds
were the cutter's own doing: _fine.key repaints enclosed magenta pale grey
(protection against accidental magenta strings), which defeated the beds we
now draw magenta ON PURPOSE. key()/main() grow a bed=True switch (the
famroll convention, used by _runroll and the refresh cuts); the run cycles'
beds went from ~70% to ~44% opaque — strings, not paddles. Enclosed pockets
of a roll's off-spec background (one sheet came back on blue) are scrubbed
by corner-colour distance too.

Both RUN CYCLES re-rolled off the friendly anchors: his landed 8 clean
frames (racket +0.05..+0.30, one side); hers took four rolls — the gates
caught a white background, a crossing racket, near-dup neighbours — and the
keeper drew a 10-frame cycle, from which the best 8 were chosen by
maximising the minimum adjacent stride (29.7%, smoother than his 22.7).
o_run7/8 return to the SPR list.

AND THE CHASE STOPS DITHERING (Oliver: "switching between a left and right
movement increasingly faster the nearer the ball comes"): intercept()
re-solves every frame and the earliest-reachable point jumps around its
solution as the flight shortens, flipping his run direction each time. The
CPU now commits to its stored target unless a fresh solve moves it by more
than 0.35 m. SPRV 121, main.js v244, 66 tests, every opponent frame verified
200 in the live game.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

assets/_regen_batches.json

@@ -408,7 +408,8 @@
   "anchor": 0,
   "check": "loose",
   "subject": "Three frames of the same tennis opponent, drawn as coarse low-resolution pixel art, side by side. FRAME 1: a plain standing frame for scale, exactly like the reference. FRAME 2 \u2014 THE BACKSWING: he has turned his shoulders and taken the racket BACK BEHIND HIS RIGHT HIP, low and well behind his body, arm coiled, racket head pointing backwards away from the net, weight on his back foot. He has NOT hit the ball yet. FRAME 3 \u2014 THE FOLLOW-THROUGH: the swing is FINISHED. His arm has swept all the way ACROSS HIS CHEST to the OTHER SIDE of his body and the racket head is now UP AND OVER HIS LEFT SHOULDER, near his left ear, his chest turned to face the net, weight on his front foot. FRAMES 2 AND 3 MUST LOOK COMPLETELY DIFFERENT FROM EACH OTHER \u2014 in frame 2 the racket is BEHIND him on his RIGHT, in frame 3 it is HIGH on his LEFT. This contrast is the whole point of the pair. Every figure is the SAME man as the reference and the SAME size: RED polo shirt, DARK CHARCOAL GREY shorts, RED cloth headband, blond hair, white shoes, seen from the FRONT. Same face, same colours, same proportions. His headband is RED, never white or cream. In both swing frames he stays UPRIGHT at his full standing height \u2014 head at the same level as the standing frame, back straight, knees only slightly bent, never crouching or lunging low. The whole racket is drawn and fully inside the canvas. His shoes are WHITE with RED socks and his shirt is a BRIGHT PURE RED, exactly like the reference \u2014 not brick, not brown, not orange.",
-  "palette_ref": "o_idle1"
+  "palette_ref": "o_idle1",
+  "pose": true
  },
  "opponent_idle": {
   "sprites": [